Law Exam MCQ Questions and Answers
Law Exam MCQ questions with answers are essential for students preparing for CLAT, AILET, Judiciary, and UPSC Law optional exams. This section tests your understanding of constitutional provisions, legal reasoning, and basic principles of jurisprudence. Practicing aptitude questions and answers with explanations in law enhances your analytical skills and ability to interpret case laws effectively. Each question is crafted to mirror the type and difficulty level found in competitive law entrance tests, ensuring that you’re well-prepared for real exam scenarios. With structured explanations and practice resources, you can strengthen both your speed and accuracy in legal problem-solving.
Law Exam MCQ
Showing 10 of
318 questions
231. The Public Prosecutor should inspect the Malkhana once is-
- A month
- Two months
- Three months
- A fortnight
232. Village Chaukidars are appointed by-
- Gram Pradhan
- In charge of the Police Station
- Superintendent of Police
- District Magistrate
233. Match List-I (Case) with List-II (Subject) and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists- List-I (a) Kehar Singh Vs. Delhi Administration (b) Nawab Ali Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (c) Vishwanath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (d) Mehboob Shah Vs. Emperor List-II 1. Right of private defence 2. Criminal Conspiracy 3. Common Intention 4. Common Object 5. Mistake of fact Codes : (a) (b) (c) (d)
- 2 4 1 3
- 3 1 5 2
- 3 4 1 2
- 2 1 5 3
234. In a cognizable offence a police officer-
- cannot arrest an accused without warrant
- can keep the accused in police custody without a remand order
- is not required to produce the accused before a magistrate
- may arrest an accused without warrant
235. ‘A’ sought to appear in LL.B. examination on the basis of forged marks-sheet of B.A., but forged marks-sheet was detected before the commencement of examination-
- ‘A’ is not guilty of cheating
- ‘A’ is guilty of attempt to cheat
- ‘A’ is guilty of cheating
- None of the above
236. Which of the following is not necessary to constitute abetment by conspiracy ?
- A conspiracy between two or more persons
- An act or illegal omission must take place in pursuance of that conspiracy
- Such an act or illegal omission must also take place in order to do the thing conspired
- The abettor should concert the offence with the person who commits it
237. 48. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the Lists- List-I (a) Tukaram Vs. State of Maharashtra (b) State Vs. Nalini (c) Barendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Emperor (d) State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukh Deo Singh List-II 1. General A.S. Vaidya case 2. Mathura rape case 3. Post-master murder case 4. Rajeev Gandhi murder case Codes : (a) (b) (c) (d)
- 2 4 3 1
- 1 2 3 4
- 4 3 2 1
- 3 1 2 4
238. Which of the following statements is not correct regarding ‘admission‘ under section 17 of Indian Evidence Act ?
- Admission operates as waiver of proof
- Admission is a statement which is necessarily against one’s own interest
- A statement which suggests some inference as to fact-in-issue or relevant fact, may be admission
- It is generally irrelevant as to whom an admission is made
239. In which section of Indian Penal Code the maxim ‘ignorantia juris non excusat’ is incorporated ?
- Section 78
- Section 76
- Section 79
- None of the above
240. Which one of the following is an illustration of criminal attempt ?
- ‘A’ tries to kill ‘B’ by witchcraft
- ‘A’ administers a poisonous drug to a woman ‘B’ with an intention to cause miscarriage, but the woman was not pregnant
- ‘A’ takes away his own umbrella thinking it to be of someone else
- ‘A’ goes to Kolkata to buy dyes to make counterfeit currency notes