Law Exam MCQ Questions and Answers
Law Exam MCQ questions with answers are essential for students preparing for CLAT, AILET, Judiciary, and UPSC Law optional exams. This section tests your understanding of constitutional provisions, legal reasoning, and basic principles of jurisprudence. Practicing aptitude questions and answers with explanations in law enhances your analytical skills and ability to interpret case laws effectively. Each question is crafted to mirror the type and difficulty level found in competitive law entrance tests, ensuring that you’re well-prepared for real exam scenarios. With structured explanations and practice resources, you can strengthen both your speed and accuracy in legal problem-solving.
Law Exam MCQ
Showing 10 of
318 questions
261. A is only charged with theft and it appears that he committed the offence of criminal breach of trust. In this context, which one of the following is correct ?
- He may be acquitted
- He may be convicted only of theft
- He may be convicted of criminal breach of trust
- He may not be convicted of criminal breach of trust
262. A Magistrate has power to deal with urgent cases of apprehended danger or nuisance under-
- Section 133, Cr.P.C.
- Section 144, Cr.P.C.
- Section 145, Cr.P.C.
- Section 107, Cr.P.C.
263. An offence of bigamy punishable under Section 494, I.P.C. was committed by A in Patna. The place where A resided with his first wife B was Gaya and the place where his first wife took up a permanent residence after the commission of the offence is Bhagalpur. The offence may be inquired into or tried by a court of competent jurisdiction at-
- Patna
- Bhagalpur
- Gaya
- All of the above
264. Which of the following Magistrates have power to prohibit repetition or continuance of public nuisance ? 1. District Magistrate 2. Sub-Divisional Magistrate 3. Judicial Magistrate 4. Executive Magistrate duly empowered in this behalf Codes :
- 1 and 4
- 2 and 3
- 1, 2 and 4
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
265. A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing them to be stolen. He offers to prove that he refused to sell them below their value. He may-
- Not prove this statement
- Prove if it is relevant otherwise than an admission
- Prove it as it is explanatory of conduct influenced by facts in issue
- None of the above
266. Which one of the following statements is correct ?
- An admission by a guardian and litem against a minor is evidence
- Admission on a point of law made by a pleader in court on behalf of the client is evidence
- Admission by one of the several defendants in a suit against another defendant is evidence
- Admission of fact made by a pleader in court on behalf of his client is evidence
267. Which one of the following is the true statement in relation to the relevancy of character ?
- In criminal cases, previous good character is irrelevant
- In criminal proceedings, previous bad character is relevant
- In civil cases, character to prove conduct imputed is relevant
- In civil cases, character of any person affecting the amount of damages is relevant
268. No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. The rationale of this rule is stated in-
- Queen Empress V s . Abdullah
- Queen Empress Vs. Babulal
- Queen Vs. Lillyman
- Pakla Narayan Swamy Vs. Emperor
269. Assertion (A) : Section 91 and 92, Evidence Act should be read together. Reason (R) : These two Sections supplement each other. Codes :
- Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
- Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
- A is true but R is false
- A is false but R is true
270. Where a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of five, how many of them need to be proved ?
- Five
- Three
- One
- Two